Before opening Literature of the Indian Languages A Bibliographical Catalogue of Books, Translations of the Scriptures, and Other Publications in the Indian Tongues of the United States — A Reader’s Guide, the edition data offers a quick orientation: 12,876 words, 56 min estimated reading time, and 2 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 14.8 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Indians of North America -- Languages -- Bibliography,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Explore this collection
These alternatives are selected using recorded categories and estimated reading time.
About 61 minutes
Science Fiction Utopias
14,026 recorded words. 5 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #58380About 63 minutes
Science Fiction Utopias
14,312 recorded words. 7 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #20416About 43 minutes
Science Fiction Utopias
9,690 recorded words. 13 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #54752Search stored excerpts and compare books → Choose by your preferences →
Choices use stored catalog measurements. Estimates vary with reading speed. A shared category is a catalog label, not a claim that two books have the same argument or literary quality.
Search reads excerpt text stored with this catalog and links to its associated Gutenberg record. The connection is stored in the site database; this tool does not recheck that every excerpt is word-for-word identical to that external record. Excerpt search does not cover every chapter and does not verify historical publication dates.
Catalog snapshot checked: 2026-09-25. Coverage: 92 public books, 92 available source excerpts.
Read the complete public-domain text at its original source.
Read on Project GutenbergHenry Rowe Schoolcraft's Literature of the Indian Languages (1849) is a bibliographical catalogue of translations, scriptures, and other works in the Indian tongues of the United States, compiled while he served in the Indian Bureau of the War Office. The catalogue is explicitly provisional: Schoolcraft notes it is "necessarily incomplete, from the short time that has been devoted to the object," and he appeals to translators to send duplicates to avoid redundancy. The work organizes entries by linguistic families—Iroquois, Algonquin, Appalachian, Dacota—but the classification itself is a subject of tension, as Schoolcraft acknowledges that a definitive philological grouping must await fuller vocabularies and grammars.
Schoolcraft groups tribes on a "geographical principle" while sensing deeper philological affiliations. For the Appalachian family, he observes "marked resemblances" between Choctaw and Chickasaw, and more remotely with Creek, yet admits that "coincidences in their vocabularies are reduced to but a few instances." He warns that no classification on philological principles can succeed until "comparatively full and reliable vocabularies and grammars of all the tribes" exist. The catalogue thus embodies a methodological tension: the need to organize knowledge versus the awareness that the data are too sparse to support firm conclusions.
Schoolcraft treats the Cherokees as a distinct case, noting their "fixed geographical position in the hills and alpine valleys," their "compactness and permanency," and their language, which he believes shares elements with the Iroquois—specifically "their original Totemic organization, the descent of the chieftaincy in the female line, and some small coincidences of language." He speculates that the original members of this group "must be sought far west, or south-west from the Mississippi." This inference, based on limited evidence, highlights the speculative nature of early linguistic anthropology.
Within the Appalachian group, Schoolcraft identifies the Natchez and Utchees as "really anomalous elements." He hypothesizes that philological research may discover in them membra disjecta of the Toltecan group, "thus to establish a historical link between the ancient Mexican and American, or United States Indians." This conjecture, supported by a footnote referencing a Creek chief's testimony, reveals how the catalogue functions not only as a bibliography but as a platform for speculative historical reconstruction, grounded in the gaps of the documentary record.
Schoolcraft's catalogue is best read as a document of its time—a snapshot of the state of knowledge in 1849, shaped by the practical needs of the Indian Bureau and the ambitions of early American ethnology. Readers should attend to the footnotes, the provisional language, and the explicit calls for contributions, which together reveal the collaborative and unfinished nature of this project. The work rewards those interested in the history of linguistics, Native American studies, and the bureaucratic contexts of knowledge production.
Schoolcraft’s catalogue always made me think of half-finished maps—languages set down in good faith, yet slipping away. I found that same tender incompleteness in Forgotten Books of the American Nursery A History of the Development of the American Story-Book — Inside the Classic, where once-beloved tales fade into murmurs. Both whisper of what we almost kept.
Save your reaction, strongest insight, and memorable passage.
