About 139 minutes
Index to Library Reports — Key Ideas to Explore
Science Fiction Utopias
31,811 recorded words. 23 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #52841The Library of William Congreve — Background and Themes can be approached with a clearer sense of reading commitment from its source measurements: 37,229 words, 2 hr 42 min estimated reading time, and 7 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 8.3 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Congreve, William, 1670-1729 -- Library -- Catalogs,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Explore this collection
These alternatives are selected using recorded categories and estimated reading time.
About 139 minutes
Science Fiction Utopias
31,811 recorded words. 23 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #52841About 191 minutes
Science Fiction Utopias
43,758 recorded words. 29 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #46414About 90 minutes
Science Fiction Utopias
20,566 recorded words. 72 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #23558Search stored excerpts and compare books → Choose by your preferences →
Choices use stored catalog measurements. Estimates vary with reading speed. A shared category is a catalog label, not a claim that two books have the same argument or literary quality.
Search reads excerpt text stored with this catalog and links to its associated Gutenberg record. The connection is stored in the site database; this tool does not recheck that every excerpt is word-for-word identical to that external record. Excerpt search does not cover every chapter and does not verify historical publication dates.
Catalog snapshot checked: 2026-09-25. Coverage: 92 public books, 92 available source excerpts.
Read the complete public-domain text at its original source.
Read on Project GutenbergJohn C. Hodges's reconstruction of William Congreve's library begins not with the playwright's own words but with a letter from his publisher Jacob Tonson, who called the collection 'genteel & well chosen.' The catalogue that follows is a meticulous record of some 500 volumes, each entry noting format, date, and often the contemporary owner or sale. Hodges's editorial apparatus—virgules for line breaks, bracketed periods for abbreviated entries—preserves the look of the original manuscript while making it legible to modern readers.
Congreve willed his books to Henrietta, Duchess of Marlborough, who in turn left them to her youngest daughter Mary—said by gossip to have been Congreve's child. Mary married the fourth Duke of Leeds, and the library passed to Hornby Castle in Yorkshire. There it remained until about 1930, when the eleventh Duke sold his estates and Sotheby's auctioned 'a Selected portion of the Valuable Library at Hornby Castle.' Hodges traces this chain of ownership through wills and sale catalogues, noting that many volumes bear the bookplates of successive owners.
The catalogue itself, titled 'Bibliotheca,' shows entries in multiple hands. Hodges distinguishes the 'first hand' (likely Congreve's own) from later additions, and he reproduces a plate of the first page with partially obliterated entries. This attention to physical evidence—ink, script, erasures—gives the reader a sense of handling the original document.
Each entry in the catalogue specifies format: folio, quarto, octavo, duodecimo. Hodges often adds parenthetical notes when the stated format seems inconsistent with the actual size. For instance, Congreve's copy of Lucan's Pharsalia in Thomas May's translation is listed as 12°, but Hodges remarks that 'perhaps Congreve's edition (listed as 12°) was misjudged because it is small for 8°.' Such observations reveal how format was a practical shorthand for value and portability, not a precise measurement.
The editor also records bindings when known—'Foliis deauratis' (gilt leaves) for a Lucretius printed by Tonson—and notes copies with 'papr.' (paper) bindings. These details, though brief, hint at which books Congreve considered display pieces and which were working copies.
Congreve's library was heavily weighted toward French and Latin, with some Italian and English. The catalogue includes Lucian in French translation by Perrot d'Ablancourt (1655) and again in a 1613 version by Jean Baudoin. Hodges identifies the translator and edition for each, often citing the Bibliothèque Nationale or the British Museum as sources. The presence of multiple editions of Lucretius—four separate entries—suggests a collector's interest in textual variants.
English works are fewer but notable: Locke's Essay Concerning Human Understanding (third edition, 1695) and his Posthumous Works (1706), alongside Nathaniel Lee's plays. The juxtaposition of classical philosophy with contemporary drama reflects the range of a Restoration wit.
Hodges does not simply transcribe; he corrects. In the entry for Charles Sorel's The Extravagant Shepherd, he supplies the author's full name and dates, and he notes that the French original appears elsewhere in the catalogue (No. 54). Cross-references like 'vide Diction. Historicum' are expanded in brackets. When a title is ambiguous—'Lloydii Dictionarium'—Hodges directs the reader to the correct entry.
He also flags errors in the modern (1955) material with mouse-hover popups, but leaves inconsistencies in the original catalogue unchanged, assuming they 'were reproduced from their originals.' This restraint preserves the historical record while making it usable.
Hodges's edition is a work of scholarly reconstruction, not a reading guide. Readers interested in the material culture of the early eighteenth century will find here a case study in how a writer's books can illuminate his intellectual habits. The catalogue rewards slow reading: each abbreviated entry opens a window onto a lost library, and the editor's quiet corrections remind us that even the most genteel collection requires careful handling.
Hodges tracing Congreve’s shelves—each binding a trace of a hand that once turned it—reminds me of leafing through my grandmother’s storybooks, their worn corners whispering of bedtime rituals. That same ache surfaced in the Forgotten Books of the American Nursery A History of the Development of the American Story-Book — Inside the Classic, where every engraved plate felt like a photograph of someone else’s childhood, quietly preserved.
Your answers remain private and are stored only in this browser.