The Contemporary Review, Volume 36, September 1879 by Various
So, I picked up The Contemporary Review from September 1879 expecting brittle pages and rarified debates about Latin grammar. Instead? I walked into a full-on brawl of a magazine, with arguments over the voting rights of women, the failings of imperialism, and whether religion squares with Darwin's new scary ideas. And the best part: these aren't just ivory-tower squabbles. These are people who care. They shout a little. They take digs at each other. It‘s surprisingly human.
The Story
Unlike a novel where you’ve got a hero and a villain, here the “story” is a time capsule of late-Victorian culture. Every article is a little essay by a different author—everyone from philanthropist to professor. They tackle big questions of the day: Should women be allowed into universities? Is the government right to expand colonies? Do we need more realism in art (or is it just gritty?) Over and over, you find them hovering around the same crisis: the pull between tradition and progress. Each writer tries to sound reasonable, but a few definitely come off as cranky, mean-sounding uncles. It's not boring “pretend” arguing; it feels real.
Why You Should Read It
Reading this did a wicked thing to my brain. I kept thinking, Wait, this sounds just like today, but seventy thousand Twitter storms later, no one acts any different. The essays show modern debates are just reruns. Need proof? There’s a whole chapter on populism and a blistering essay about how big-tech-influencers aren't a thing yet, but book-opinion shops… definitely were a big deal? The most fun part? These little articles reveal a battleground you never hear about: not war timelines, but fluff like “proper childrearing tips.” These Victorians were no saints. The editors include three lines from a pious editor, then go: “I hear the opposite argument is also true,” and proceed to let the Other Side dunk on everything. I devoured it.
Final Verdict
Pick this up if you’re a history nerd with a short attention span—or just someone who overhears debate podcasts and wishes they were a century older. If you enjoy the interplay between old thinkers bickering through print, unslick argument style, this won’t kill you. It feels like a lively college town coffee shop, kept under Victorian manners and but with modern sneaking arguments sneaking behind cravats. A wonderful slow-read for curious people plus The Twilight Zone fans.
No rights are reserved for this publication. You do not need permission to reproduce this work.
William White
3 months agoThe clarity of the introduction set high expectations, and the breakdown of complex theories into digestible segments is masterfully done. This should be on the reading list of every serious professional.